The play in three steps
High-intent prompts run on several LLMs return the same competitors, never them, three weeks in a row.
A share of their buyers now asks ChatGPT before Google, and gets a short list they are not on. No dashboard they own shows it.
Send the prompt and the link to the answer. Name the competitors that came back. No AI-search pitch, no method: the screenshot is the pain.
Who it targets
- Ideal customer
- Companies in your size range with a real organic presence and zero mention in AI answers on their category prompts.
- Decision maker
- Head of marketing or founder. Whoever owns the traffic number.
- Where the signal is read
- Your list of category prompts, run weekly on ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, answers logged with the names they return.
- Window
- Months, and it widens. Every week they stay absent the competitors named get cited more.
First email
{firstName}, I asked ChatGPT "{buyerPrompt}" this morning ({answerLink}).
It named {competitorName} and {competitorTwo}. Not {companyName}. Same on Gemini and Perplexity.
If I could get you cited on that prompt and the ones like it in [your timeframe], without touching your site's structure (you just [the one thing they do]), would you be interested in hearing more ?
{yourFirstName}
{yourDomain}
PS: run the prompt yourself, it takes ten seconds and it is worse than my screenshot.
From the signal to the first touch
Category prompts on three LLMs every week, names logged.
Absent three weeks in a row, your size range, your exclusion list.
The verified email of the head of marketing.
Email with the link, LinkedIn, a second prompt. A human on every reply.
Recommended tools
Claude
Runs your category prompts and logs which names come back.
Apify
Reads the same prompts on ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity each week.
FullEnrich
Finds the verified email of the head of marketing.
Instantly
Sends the three touches from your own mailboxes.